NSW Fair Trading enforces consumer protection laws in New South Wales. They target issues like unlicensed work, fraud, and misleading conduct in sectors such as property, building, and automotive.
When traders break the law, Fair Trading steps in with real enforcement action. Last year alone, they started more than 1,600 investigations and handed out almost $1.6 million in fines.
In this article, we look at real NSW Fair Trading enforcement cases and the actual penalties imposed. You will see how the regulator investigates misconduct, what laws businesses breach most often, and what practical tips you can apply to reduce compliance risk.
How NSW Fair Trading Enforcement Works
NSW Fair Trading uses a range of tools to address violations under laws like the Property and Stock Agents Act and the Australian Consumer Law. It starts with warnings or penalty notices for minor issues, then escalates to fines up to $11,000 for individuals or $22,000 for corporations, license suspensions, cancellations, or permanent disqualifications.
Courts can impose higher penalties, community service orders, or jail time for serious crimes like trust account fraud, which carries up to 10 years imprisonment.
Regular trust account audit reviews help agencies detect errors early, strengthen internal controls, and reduce the risk of these severe enforcement outcomes.
It Usually Starts With a Complaint
NSW Fair Trading receives more than 50,000 complaints a year across building, motor vehicles, property, and retail. Consumers lodge these online with supporting documents attached. The regulator can also act on market monitoring or intelligence from other agencies.
Assessment and Conciliation Come First
Every complaint does not lead to prosecution. Fair Trading checks jurisdiction, then attempts conciliation between both parties. Many matters close here. Businesses that respond cooperatively and fix the issue quickly often avoid formal penalties entirely.
Formal Investigation
If a breach is suspected, Fair Trading can open a formal investigation. Officers can request documents, issue statutory notices, conduct interviews, inspect premises, and obtain expert reports. Ignoring a lawful notice is itself an offence, so responding on time and getting legal advice early matters.
Enforcement Options
Depending on the seriousness of the breach, Fair Trading can issue on-the-spot fines, enter into enforceable undertakings, suspend or cancel licences, take matters to court, or publish public warnings. Court penalties for corporations can reach tens of millions of dollars. Public naming can damage reputation even when the fine is small.
How Severity Is Decided
The regulator considers the level of consumer harm, whether the conduct was intentional, the money involved, prior history, and how cooperative the business was. A one-off mistake may get a warning. A deliberate or repeated breach is far more likely to end in prosecution.
Real NSW Fair Trading Enforcement Cases
Below are real types of cases that show how breaches lead to real penalties
Case Study 1: The Wedding Photographer Who Did Not Show Up
Emily Jayne Andres ran a photography and videography business called Andres & Co. Couples paid her to capture their wedding days. Between March 2023 and February 2025, she took their money but failed to deliver the services. In one case, she did not even turn up to the wedding.
NSW Fair Trading received 68 complaints about the business and launched an investigation. They took the matter to court. The magistrate found her guilty of 15 breaches of Australian Consumer Law.
The court handed down serious penalties. They fined her $48,250. They also ordered her to pay $51,760 in compensation directly to the affected couples. This sent a strong message: Fair Trading makes traders pay back what they take.
Before the court case finished, Fair Trading issued a public warning. They named the business and told consumers to stay away. It is a tool they use to stop further harm while investigations continue.
Case Study 2: Strata Manager Who Stole $2 Million from Owners
Jessica Marrie Carah worked as a strata manager in Coffs Harbour. Her job was to look after money for apartment blocks and building schemes. Instead, she stole it.
Over just 11 months, Carah moved money from 66 different strata schemes into her personal bank account. She did this 398 times. The total amount she stole came to more than $2 million. Owners paid their levies expecting repairs and insurance. Carah spent their money on herself.
NSW Fair Trading investigated the matter thoroughly. They gathered evidence and built a case against her. The regulator then took disciplinary action to stop her from ever working in the industry again.
The penalties were severe. Fair Trading cancelled her licence completely. They also disqualified her from the property and strata industry for life. The official finding stated she was not a “fit and proper person” to work in this field. It is the harshest penalty available.
This case now appears on the new “Name and Shame” register. Anyone can search for Carah’s name online and see exactly what she did and the penalty she received. The register makes enforcement actions public and easy to find.
Types of Penalties NSW Fair Trading Can Impose
NSW Fair Trading has a broad toolkit when it comes to enforcement. The approach it takes will depend on the nature and seriousness of the breach.
- Penalty notices are on-the-spot fines issued for certain offences. They are relatively quick to issue and do not require court proceedings.
- Enforceable undertakings are legally binding agreements between the regulator and the business. Under an undertaking, the business agrees to fix the problem, compensate affected consumers, and put better compliance systems in place. These are often used where the regulator wants to achieve a practical outcome without going to court.
- Licence suspension or cancellation is a common outcome in the building, property, and strata industries. Losing a licence can effectively shut down a business, so this is one of the more serious non-court outcomes available to the regulator.
- Court proceedings are reserved for the most serious matters. Courts can impose significantly higher penalties than the regulator can issue directly. For corporations, maximum penalties under consumer law can reach tens of millions of dollars, depending on the size of the business and the benefit gained from the breach.
- Public warnings and media releases are used regularly by NSW Fair Trading. The regulator often publishes enforcement outcomes, including the name of the business, the nature of the breach, and the penalty imposed. Even where the financial penalty is relatively modest, a public naming can cause lasting reputational da
Are your trust accounts fully compliant with NSW Fair Trading requirements right now?
Even small reconciliation errors or record keeping gaps can breach the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 and put your licence at risk. Our independent trust account audit reviews your records, tests compliance, and identifies issues before regulators do. We provide clear, practical fixes to keep your audit ready.
Book now and protect your business.
Check Our Trust Account Audit Services:
Related Articles:
